BINAYAK SEN JUDGEMENT PDF

Given below is the full text of the judgement sentencing Dr Binayak Sen for life. It is a translation from the Hindi. The translation has been done. Binayak Sen is an Indian paediatrician, public health specialist and activist. He is the national .. Against this judgement, Binayak again applied for bail on 6 January An eight-member delegation of the European Union were present at. Sanhati Statement on the Binayak Sen Judgement. We are deeply anguished by the convictions and sentences of Dr. Binayak Sen, Piyush Guha, and Narayan.

Author: Ferr Vuzshura
Country: Zimbabwe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 13 October 2007
Pages: 430
PDF File Size: 19.17 Mb
ePub File Size: 11.76 Mb
ISBN: 937-6-34714-690-2
Downloads: 38199
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulugrel

It is a translation from the Hindi. This proves that the prosecution followed procedure and filed the chargesheet against the accused in the court only after they obtained required permission and sanction for prosecution. Judgemnet hearing completed last week. There is an urban network of Naxalites in Durg as well as Raipur city. Similarly, various pages in book number-2 mention Rupantar organization and describe many other articles.

Binayak Sen gets life term

And so, it usually does not get debated in the intellectual circles. Share on Facebook Share on Twitter. Binayak Sen is not held guilty binyaak Sec. The Judge, however, accepted the testimony of witness Anil Singh, a passer-by.

The Indian Legislator News. Retrieved 26 May This witness said that the accused Narayan Sanyal present in the court is also known as Vijay Da. On the basis of the above investigation, the prosecution has failed to prove the allegation of crimes against Pijush Guha, Narayan Judgeent and Dr. The witness further said that during his tenure, Narayan Sanyal used to get things from outside the jail by submitting applications.

Local markets were made to shut down, and means of transport close down. Ever criticised an elected government for its corruption during the Commonwealth Games, sem while campaigning for election, or in Parliament or even at home? In the same way, as per Chhattisgarh government notification no.

Did Binayak Sen’s conviction for sedition foretell the mess we are in today?

It must also be mentioned here that during the recording of evidence by prosecution witnesses, they were not asked specific questions about the said contradictions and made to confront the Investigating Officer and so the accused cannot get the benefit of the said argument.

  ISO 8062-3 PDF

The accused have not asked for cross examination een the experts concerned.

Supreme Court of India. Ruling in the famous Kedarnath vs State of Bihar case, the court asserted then that a prosecution cannot sustain binayyak charge of sedition against an accused if the accused did not directly incite violence. The audited reports Exhibits P 43 to P 45 were audited by Defence Witness 11 Judgemrnt Arif himself, as stated in his testimony and he also stated that his signatures are present on the audit report.

Full text: The Binayak Sen Judgement (English Translation)

It is also argued that according to the narrative of the prosecution, accused Pijush Guha was arrested from Station Road, Ganj, whereas the rejoinder affidavit filed by investigator BBS Rajput in the Honourable Supreme Court shows the accused Pijush Guha as being arrested from Hotel Mahindra.

Prasad asked the Chhattisgarh government to file its response within four weeks. Since she was not present, the house was sealed and this was videographed. Here it is extremely relevant to mention that the accused Vinayak Sen himself received the copy of the chargesheet dated The letter found no mention in the attested list of documents recovered from his residence on the same day.

Living people births Amnesty International prisoners of conscience held by India Brahmos Indian civil rights activists Indian paediatricians Indian human rights activists Naxalite—Maoist insurgency Indian prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment Gandhi International Peace Award Recipients 20th-century Indian medical doctors People from Raipur, Chhattisgarh Medical doctors from Chhattisgarh Prisoners sentenced to life imprisonment by India Binahak from Chhattisgarh.

They were sentenced to life imprisonment. Vs State of Maharashtra 3 Crimes being different from the present case, the accused cannot get any benefits from these.

In the said magazine, accused Narayan Sanyal has been described as a member of the politburo of the party, and his arrest has been condemned and his release demanded, and those comrades who have been killed in encounters are called martyrs and presented as ideal. This proves the fact of phone conversations and contact between accused Dr.

  D60 HANDBUCH PDF

From November to April he was jail superintendent in Raipur jail. But the point to understand here is the law of sedition that Sen was accused of, the evidence brought to court, and whether the evidence supports the charge.

While taking the house on rent, accused Binayak Sen said that Narayan Sanyal was his relative. Retrieved 16 April They were sentenced to one year imprisonment and Rs fine under section 8 2 of the state Act, to three years prison term and a fine of Rs under section 8 3 of that Act and to five years imprisonment and fine of Rs under its Section 8 5Dubey said.

Dr Binayak Sen found guilty of sedition, gets life imprisonment | India News – Times of India

Vinayak Sen and family members of accused Narayan Sanyal. We will have judgemenh wait till justice is rightly delivered.

Notify me of new comments via email. Therefore, using the powers granted by section 3, subsection 1 of the Chhattisgarh Vishesh Janaksha Adhiniyam, Number 14 ofthe state government declares the following organizations unlawful organizations for one ginayak from 12 April Binayak Sen and Ilina Sen also used to come to these meetings.

Amita, Shankar, Narayan Sanyal are hardcore Naxalites. Coram Children’s Legal Centre When she went on leave she applied to him. However, the said facts were corroborated by witness Niranjan Singh PW 17 in his testimony, kudgement the seized applications of Exhibits P 30 and P 31, seized as per seizure memo Exhibit P judfement, and applications of exhibit P 27 to Exhibit P 45, seized as per seizure memo of Exhibit P 26, from Narayan Sanyal, are described as being seized by the police in his presence.