KUBARK Manual: A User’s Guide to Torture? – The KUBARK manual was written by the CIA in the s as a means of standardizing interrogation techniques. This manual cannot teach anyone how to be, or become, a good Its purpose is to provide guidelines for KUBARK interrogation, and. “An environment still more subject to control, such as water-tank or iron lung, is even more effective,” the KUBARK manual concludes.
|Published (Last):||26 July 2005|
|PDF File Size:||2.50 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||9.53 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Though he retreats from reality, he does not want to feel abandoned. The walk-in may be asked to identify all relatives and friends in the area, or even the country, in which PBPRIME asylum is first requested. People who have had practical training in being interrogated become sophisticated subjects, able to spot uncertainty, obvious tricks, and other weaknesses.
Sometimes such people actually commit crimes in order to confess and be punished. Assumptions have normally been made already as to what he is withholding: The interrogator should reserve his fire-power until he knows what he is up against. He tells A to speak up, that he can hardly hear him. It is useful to recognize in advance whether the information desired would be threatening or damaging in any way to the interests of the interrogates.
While the excerpts released by the Pentagon are a useful and not misleading selection of the most egregious passages, the ones most clearly advocating torture, execution and blackmail, they do not provide adequate insight into the manuals’ highly objectionable framework. Here Horowitz’s study of the nature of confession is pertinent.
In either event, he is unlikely to cause serious trouble in the future. Once the flow starts, the screener should try not to stop it by questions, gestures, or other kubqrk until sufficient information has been revealed to permit a rough determination of type.
The interrogator should make a mental note of the topic that caused such a reaction. All non-Communist services are bothered at times by disgruntled exinterrogatees who press demands and threaten or take hostile action if the demands are not satisfied.
The whole purpose of screening and a major purpose of the first stage of the interrogation is to probe the strengths and weaknesses of the subject. From the beginning of planning to the end of questioning it has been necessary to understand and guard against the various troubles that a vengeful ex-source can cause. Ignoring or ridiculing his bragging, or cutting him short with a demand that he get down to cases, is likely to make him resentful and to stop the flow.
The witness is whisked past the interrogatee; the two are not allowed to speak to each other.
Now, however, he keeps coming back to each area of sensitivity until he has determined the location of each and the intensity of the defenses. But I hate to release one of you before the other; you ought to get out at the same time. In fact, it is likely to be a failure, and the interrogator should not be dissuaded from the effort to establish rapport by an inward conviction that no man in his right mind would incriminate himself by providing the kind of information that is sought.
U.S. Army and CIA interrogation manuals – Wikipedia
Poor initial handling or a fundamental antipathy can make a source uncooperative even if he has nothing significant or damaging to conceal. He is trying to do two seemingly contradictory things at once: He sometimes gratifies his feeling of secret superiority by provoking unjust treatment. We don’t need him any more. Allowing an interrogatee to receive carefully selected letters from home can contribute to effects desired by the interrogator.
It suffices for the present purpose to list the following principles:. The history of interrogation is full of confessions and other self-incriminations that were in essence the result of a substitution of the interrogation world for the world outside. He will tell the interrogator what he thinks the interrogator wants to hear in order to win the award of seeing a smile on the interrogator’s face. Anxious, self-centered interrogatees who are withholding significant facts, such as contact with a hostile service, are likelier to divulge if made to feel that the truth will not be used to harm them and if the interrogator also stresses the callousness and stupidity of the adversary in sending so valiant a person upon so ill-prepared a mission.
The Conclusion C.
U.S. Army and CIA interrogation manuals
A plain table may be preferable. If you have in your possession a letter written by the witness, in which he takes an opposite position on some part of the case to the one he has just sworn to, avoid the common error of showing the witness the letter for identification, and then reading it to him with the inquiry, kubxrk have you to say to that? In brief, the techniques that follow should match the personality of the individual interrogatee, and their effectiveness is intensified by good timing and rapid exploitation of the moment of shock.
The list seems almost endless – a professional manner, forcefulness, understanding and sympathy, breadth of general knowledge, area knowledge, “a practical knowledge of psychology”, skill in the tricks of the trade, alertness, perseverance, integrity, discretion, patience, a high I.
They are convinced that the justice of the claim is plain for all to see and that any refusal to grant it is willfully malignant. Interrogations conducted under compulsion or duress are especially likely to involve illegality and to entail damaging consequences for KUBARK. He tends to brag and often msnuais through hunger for approval or praise.
CIA Torture Manual: See Inside The Declassified KUBARK Handbook